Family of woman killed on 'Rust' set sues Alec Baldwin, others | Inquirer Entertainment

Family of woman killed on ‘Rust’ set sues Alec Baldwin, others

/ 10:29 AM February 16, 2022

Actor Alec Baldwin of the film "LymeLife" poses during the 33rd Toronto International Film Festival

Actor Alec Baldwin of the film “LymeLife” poses during the 33rd Toronto International Film Festival, Sept. 8, 2008. Image: Reuters/Mark Blinch

LOS ANGELES — The family of a woman killed during filming of the Western “Rust” filed a wrongful death lawsuit against actor Alec Baldwin and others on Tuesday, claiming they disregarded several standard industry practices meant to keep movie sets safe.

The civil suit was filed in Santa Fe County, New Mexico, on behalf of Matthew Hutchins, husband of late cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, and the couple’s 9-year-old son.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The lawsuit names Alec Baldwin and others who are responsible for the safety on the set and whose reckless behavior and cost cutting led to the senseless and tragic death of Halyna Hutchins,” attorney Brian Panish said at a news conference in Los Angeles.

FEATURED STORIES

Halyna Hutchins was killed and director Joel Souza was wounded when a .45-caliber Colt revolver Baldwin was using during a rehearsal fired off a live bullet. The movie, on which Baldwin also served as a producer, was being filmed at Bonanza Creek Ranch outside Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Aaron Dyer, an attorney for Baldwin and other “Rust” producers, said, “Any claim that Alec was reckless is entirely false.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The “30 Rock” and “Saturday Night Live” actor has said he was told the gun was “cold,” an industry term meaning it is safe to use.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This protocol has worked on thousands of films, with millions of discharges, and there has never before been an incident on a set where an actual bullet harmed anyone,” Dyer said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Actors should be able to rely on armorers and prop department professionals, as well as assistant directors, rather than deciding on their own when a gun is safe to use,” Dyer added.

But Panish said Baldwin bore “a significant portion of liability” because he shot the weapon that killed Halyna Hutchins.

Article continues after this advertisement

The attorney showed an animated recreation of what he believed happened inside a church where actors were filming when the shooting occurred. Panish said he did not believe the weapon was defective.

“The gun cannot fire unless the trigger is engaged and the hammer is back,” Panish said during the video. “So he had the gun. He says he pulled the hammer back. It fired. She was killed.”

Baldwin has said he pulled the gun’s hammer back but did not pull the trigger. The lawsuit said Baldwin had a responsibility to keep his finger away from the trigger and not operate the hammer during a rehearsal.

The incident remains under investigation by New Mexico authorities who are trying to determine how live ammunition made it onto the movie set. No criminal charges have been filed.

Panish said Baldwin should have personally checked the gun to ensure it did not contain live rounds, and that he should not have pointed it directly at a person.

The lawsuit, which seeks unspecified damages, named about two dozen defendants in addition to Baldwin, including armorer Hannah Gutierrez Reed and assistant director David Halls. Representatives for Gutierrez Reed and Halls did not immediately respond to requests for comment. JB

RELATED STORIES:

Alec Baldwin’s wife fears actor might develop PTSD after movie set shooting

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

‘Vibrant’ cinematographer remembered as police probe Alec Baldwin shooting

TAGS: accidents, Alec Baldwin, armorer, Rust, workplace safety

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.