Groups want Weinstein's case hearing open | Inquirer Entertainment

News groups fight to keep Harvey Weinstein’s hearing open

/ 05:49 PM April 23, 2019

Harvey Weinstein, left, leaves court with attorney Ron Sullivan, Friday, Jan. 25, 2019, in New York. Image: AP Photo/Mark Lennihan

NEW YORK — News organizations are fighting to pull back the curtain on a Harvey Weinstein court appearance that the prosecution and defense want held in secret.

The organizations, including The Associated Press and The New York Times, argued in court papers filed Monday that the sides haven’t met a high legal standard for banning the media and the public from Friday’s hearing in Weinstein’s sexual assault case.

Article continues after this advertisement

Prosecutors contend the hearing should be closed to protect Weinstein’s right to a fair trial and for the privacy of women whose allegations against him are not part of the underlying criminal charges. Weinstein’s lawyers say news coverage could taint the jury pool.

FEATURED STORIES

Prosecutors want the women to testify at Weinstein’s June 3 trial to show he has had a pattern of violating women. They also expect to discuss evidence that could be used against Weinstein if he testifies.

A lawyer for the news organizations, Robert Balin, argues that holding the hearing behind closed doors would do nothing to safeguard Weinstein’s right to a fair trial because allegations against him from more than 80 women have already been widely reported.

Article continues after this advertisement

Many of those women, such as actresses Mira Sorvino and Ashley Judd, have agreed to be identified publicly.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Clearly, there is no rational basis — let alone ‘compelling circumstances” — that could justify the Parties’ effort to suppress this information now that it is in the public domain as a result of intensive news reporting,” Balin wrote in the filing.

Article continues after this advertisement

Balin called closing the courtroom an “extreme remedy” and argued that as much as possible the hearing should be held in open court.

Weinstein is charged with raping an unidentified female acquaintance in his hotel room in 2013 and performing a forcible sex act on a different woman in 2006. Those women have not agreed to be publicly identified. The Associated Press does not identify people who say they are victims of sexual assault unless they come forward publicly.

Article continues after this advertisement

Weinstein has denied all allegations of nonconsensual sex. He pleaded not guilty and is free on $1 million (around P52 million) bail. His trial is scheduled to begin June 3.

In January, Weinstein hired Casey Anthony’s lawyer, Jose Baez, to lead a remade defense team after his previous lawyer lost a hard-fought bid to get his case thrown out. Anthony was acquitted on charges of killing her young daughter.

Judge James Burke said he would hear arguments from the news organizations’ lawyers just before the start of Friday’s hearing. The lawyers, in their filing, asked to be heard sooner so that they may appeal if he rules against them.

The news organizations are also requesting that documents filed under seal in the case be made public and that all future filings, even ones made under seal, be listed on the case docket so that “the public and press receive prompt notice that such materials exist.” MKH

RELATED STORIES: 

‘Untouchable’ charts the rise and fall of Harvey Weinstein

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Harvey Weinstein breaks with his criminal defense lawyer

TAGS: Harvey Weinstein, lawsuit, New York, Sexual harassment

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.