Sarah Lahbati’s libel, unjust vexation raps vs GMA exec junked | Inquirer Entertainment

Sarah Lahbati’s libel, unjust vexation raps vs GMA exec junked

By: - Reporter
/ 05:26 PM February 24, 2014

SARAH Lahbati

MANILA, Philippines — Virtually lecturing actress Sarah Lahbati to grow a thicker skin, the Quezon City prosecutor’s office dropped the libel and unjust vexation charges she filed against the president of GMA Network Films whom she accused of making malicious and offensive public statements against her.

Assistant city prosecutor Nicasio Rosales junked the cases filed by Lahbati against Anna Teresa Gozon-Abrogar for lack of probable cause, pointing out that the public statements the actress found malicious were mere comments to the suits she claimed to have filed in court.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The complainant (Lahbati) should not be onion-skinned when she heard or read a reaction or comment to what she did. She cannot have the cake and eat it at the same time. Respondent is not motivated with ill-will or spite but in response to duty, that is, her duty to defend herself,” Rosales said in his nine-page resolution.

FEATURED STORIES

Lahbati had charged the network executive with making malicious statements against her on interviews for the entertainment segment of the news program “24 Oras” of GMA7 aired on July 19, 2013, and in a talk show the next day. Abrogar had been reacting to reports of her filing criminal charges in the Quezon City prosecutor’s office.

The actress claimed in her complaint for libel and unjust vexation that Abrogar had maliciously implied in the  interviews that she had no intention of pursuing the charges in court.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lahbati further alleged that a statement that Abrogar had released and published in social networking sites and newspapers also accused her and her lawyer of being disrespectful to the media and the judiciary, a jab that she maintained was below the belt.

Article continues after this advertisement

In her defense, Abrogar pointed out that her statements were neither derogatory nor offensive.

Article continues after this advertisement

Rosales resolved that there was insufficient evidence to establish probable cause and charge Abrogar with libel and unjust vexation in court.

The assistant city prosecutor said that Abrogar’s statements were mere reactions to Lahbati’s filing of criminal complaints in court against her. He stressed that it was well within Abrogar’s right to defend herself.

Article continues after this advertisement

Last year, the Quezon City prosecutor’s office junked the grave coercion charge Lahbati filed against seven officials and employees of GMA7, including the network’s chairman and chief executive officer Felipe Gozon for lack of evidence.

Lahbati had claimed then that she was threatened and intimidated into signing a co-management contract with a subsidiary company despite her exclusive deal with GMA7 network. She alleged that when she refused to sign the contract, she was not paid her talent fee.

But according to the city prosecutor, the fact that she was able to refuse signing the contract negated her claim that she was being coerced into signing the deal.

RELATED STORIES

Unanswered, GMA-7’s P8.5M suit vs Sarah Lahbati may be archived

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Actress Sarah Lahbati sues GMA-7 exec for perjury

Follow @jiandradeINQ on Twitter
TAGS: Anna Teresa Gozon-Abrogar, Celebrities, courts, Entertainment, GMA Network, Libel, litigation, Quezon City Prosecutor’s Office, sarah lahbati, trials, unjust vexation

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.