Court revives child pornography lawsuit over Nirvana’s ‘Nevermind’ cover | Inquirer Entertainment
DID YOU KNOW?

Court revives child pornography lawsuit over Nirvana’s ‘Nevermind’ cover

/ 12:15 AM December 29, 2023

Court revives child pornography lawsuit over Nirvana’s ‘Nevermind’ cover

Spencer Elden on the cover of Nirvana’s “Nevermind” album —CONTRIBUTED PHOTO.

A US appeals court on Thursday revived a lawsuit accusing rock band Nirvana of publishing child pornography by using a photograph of a naked 4-month-old baby on the cover of its hit 1991 album, “Nevermind.”

The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court’s decision that Spencer Elden, the baby depicted on the cover, had waited too long to bring his lawsuit against the seminal Seattle grunge band.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court did not address whether the cover of “Nevermind” constitutes child pornography.

FEATURED STORIES

‘Exploitation’

“This procedural setback does not change our view,” Nirvana attorney Bert Deixler said on Thursday. “We will defend this meritless case with vigor and expect to prevail.”

Elden’s attorney Robert Lewis said that Elden is “very pleased with the decision and looks forward to having his day in court.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Elden, now 32, first sued the band and its label Universal Music Group in 2021, accusing them of sexually exploiting him through his depiction on the “Nevermind” album cover and causing him continuing personal harm.Other defendants include surviving Nirvana members Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic, late lead singer Kurt Cobain’s widow Courtney Love, and photographer Kirk Weddle.

Article continues after this advertisement

The lawsuit stemmed from Nirvana’s use of a photo taken by Weddle at Pasadena Aquatic Center in California that depicted Elden swimming naked toward a dollar bill pierced on a fish hook.

Article continues after this advertisement

US District Judge Fernando Olguin in Los Angeles said last year that Elden’s lawsuit must be dismissed because he did not sue within a 10-year limitations period after learning of the cover.

A unanimous 9th Circuit panel reversed the decision on Thursday. The appeals court said that Elden could still sue based on Nirvana’s republication of the cover more recently, including in a rereleased version of “Nevermind” from 2021. —Reuters

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.