The elite South Korean businesswoman behind Oscar-winning Parasite | Inquirer Entertainment

The elite South Korean businesswoman behind Oscar-winning Parasite

/ 04:54 PM February 13, 2020

SEOUL — The woman who stepped up to make the final acceptance speech when Bong Joon-ho’s satire Parasite – about the gap between rich and poor – won the Oscar for Best Picture is herself a member of South Korea’s wealthiest family.

Miky Lee, an heiress turned media mogul, is the executive producer of the first non-English-language film to secure the Academy Awards’ top prize in their 92-year history.

The elite South Korean businesswoman behind Oscar-winning Parasite

This file photo taken on February 9, 2020, shows executive producer Miky Lee (C) speaking as the producers and team for the film “Parasite” look on after accepting the award for Best Picture at the 92nd Oscars at the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, California. – South Korea’s first film to win the Best Picture at Oscars is a tale about the widening gap between the rich and poor, but in an ironic twist its top prize acceptance speech was given by one of the country’s wealthiest people often linked to corruption. (Photo by Mark RALSTON / AFP)

The film has been praised at home and abroad for its critique of inequality, but Lee is the granddaughter of Lee Byung-chul, the founder of the giant Samsung group – by far the largest of the family-controlled, often-controversial conglomerates known as chaebol that dominate business in the world’s 12th-largest economy.

Article continues after this advertisement

She is the vice chairwoman of the CJ Group, a food, and entertainment giant that was spun out of Samsung in the 1990s as the empire was divided between different arms of the family.

FEATURED STORIES

Chaebol families are often intimately connected with South Korea’s political class, and her cousin is Lee Jae-yong, the Samsung Electronics vice-chairman currently on trial for bribing former president Park Geun-hye in a corruption scandal that saw her ousted from power.

But Miky Lee herself was secretly blacklisted by Park’s conservative government after she invested in a film based on the life of left-leaning president Roh Moo-hyun.

Article continues after this advertisement

A diminutive Harvard graduate, she is known as a cinematic connoisseur, with previous collaborations with Bong including “Memories of Murder” (2003), “Mother” (2009), and the Tilda Swinton-starring “Snowpiercer” (2013).

Article continues after this advertisement

Among those she praised in her Oscars speech were Korean filmgoers, who she said “never hesitated to give us straightforward opinion”, driving directors and creators to “keep pushing the envelopes”.

Article continues after this advertisement

She also thanked her brother, the CJ chairman Lee Jay-Hyun – a controversial figure who was convicted in 2014 on charges ranging from embezzlement to tax evasion.

Her address “ultimately made for a very meta ending to Parasite’s award season,” said Keung Yoon Bae, a Ph.D. candidate researching film and media at Harvard University.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It speaks to the parasitic relationship Korea as a whole has with chaebol conglomerates,” she told AFP. “The films pointing out the broken system are made within that system themselves.”

DreamWorks deal

The unprecedented Oscars haul for “Parasite” is the culmination of a corporate push into Hollywood that Lee has spearheaded for years.

In 1995, she invested $300 million in DreamWorks studio as it was set up by Hollywood heavyweights, including Steven Spielberg.

She is a member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the powerful organization that awards the Oscars, and has connections throughout show business in the United States, where she moved after her blacklisting.

Lee supervises CJ ENM, one of the South’s biggest media groups, which has operations in television, K-pop, film studios and multiplexes, subsidiaries in at least six countries, and a market capitalization of 3.7 trillion won ($3 billion).

The South’s “popular culture industry is as controlled by chaebol conglomerates as the production of semiconductors, ships or cars,” according to Vladimir Tikhonov, a Korean studies professor at the University of Oslo.

South Korean reports say the firm spent $8.5 million on an Oscar campaign for “Parasite” – including screenings, adverts, and publicity events to appeal to voters – although the company declined to confirm the figure to AFP.

In the event, it took home four Oscars, including best director, best screenplay and best international feature film, but So-Rim Lee of the University of Pennsylvania pointed out that none of the acceptance speeches, including Bong’s, raised “the actual social issues they purport to address through the film”.

‘Fanatic passion’

Director Bong –- who was also blacklisted under Park Geun-hye – lauds Lee as “a huge fan of film, TV, and music”.

“She’s a true cinephile who’s watched so many films and managed to bring over that fanatic passion to the world of business,” the Hollywood Reporter quoted him as saying.

But the South’s chaebols have often been accused of being root causes – via unethical practices such as exploitation of monopoly power and union suppression – of the widening inequality his film portrays.

The contribution Lee, 61, and CJ have made to Korean cinema “cannot be understated”, scholar Bae wrote in a tweet.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

It also “underlines the fact that the frequently leftist, populist, anti-wealth messages in Korean cinema are conveyed through the vehicle of chaebol funding”.

TAGS: cinema, Entertainment, Film, International news, movie, news, Oscars, social, South Korea, World, world news

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.