Amber Heard says online 'hate and vitriol' during Johnny Depp trial not 'fair' | Inquirer Entertainment

Amber Heard says online ‘hate and vitriol’ during Johnny Depp trial not ‘fair’

/ 12:24 PM June 15, 2022

Amber Heard

In this file photo taken on June 1, 2022, Amber Heard waits before the jury said that they believe she defamed ex-husband Johnny Depp while announcing split verdicts in favor of both her ex-husband Johnny Depp and Heard on their claim and counter-claim in the Depp vs. Heard civil defamation trial at the Fairfax County Circuit Courthouse in Fairfax, Virginia. Image: AFP/Evelyn Hockstein

Amber Heard said the “hate and vitriol” she suffered on social media during her libel trial against Johnny Depp was not “fair,” but insisted in an interview released Monday she did not blame the jury for largely siding with her ex-husband.

After a six-week legal tussle between the former Hollywood power couple, a United States jury awarded Depp more than $10 million in damages for defamation, in contrast to just $2 million for Heard who had counter-sued.

Article continues after this advertisement

The case, live-streamed to millions, featured lurid and intimate details about the celebrities’ private lives, and Heard was targeted by countless social media posts and internet memes throughout.

FEATURED STORIES

“I don’t presume the average person should know those things,” Heard told NBC in her first major interview since the verdict. “And so I don’t take it personally.”

“But even somebody who is sure I’m deserving of all this hate and vitriol, even if you think that I’m lying, you still couldn’t look me in the eye and tell me that you think on social media there’s been a fair representation.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“You cannot tell me that you think that this has been fair,” she said in a clip from the interview, which airs in full on NBC News’ Dateline on Friday.

Article continues after this advertisement

Depp sued Heard over a Washington Post op-ed in which she did not name him, but described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” Heard counter-sued after Depp’s lawyer described her abuse claims as a “hoax.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Online public opinion during the trial appeared to come down heavily on Depp’s side, and Heard’s lawyers accused his legal team of working to “demonize” her.

Heard’s attorney Elaine Bredehoft has said the “Aquaman” star wants to appeal the verdict.

Article continues after this advertisement

“How could they make a judgement, how could they not come to that conclusion?” Heard asked in the interview. “I don’t blame them. I actually understand he’s a beloved character. And people feel they know him. He’s a fantastic actor.”

When interviewer Savannah Guthrie suggested it was the jury’s duty to not be swayed by Depp’s A-list status, Heard responded: “Again, how could they (not be) — after listening to three and a half weeks of testimony about how I was a non-credible person, not to believe a word that came out of my mouth?” AP/JB

RELATED STORIES:

Johnny Depp celebrates defamation verdict, Amber Heard ‘heartbroken’

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

High and low points of Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard trial

TAGS: Amber Heard, domestic violence, Johnny Depp, Libel, Social Media

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.