Will streaming be theatre's death or its saviour? | Inquirer Entertainment

Will streaming be theatre’s death or its saviour?

/ 03:34 PM June 27, 2020

Claire Foy

Claire Foy and Matt Smith will step out onto a London stage to act in a socially distanced version of a hit play about how the world is going to hell in a handcart. Image: AFP/Miguel Medina

As a metaphor for the desperate position theatre has been put in by the coronavirus, “Lungs” is hard to beat.

On Friday Claire Foy and Matt Smith will step out onto a London stage to act in a socially distanced version of a hit play about how the world is going to hell in a handcart.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Old Vic hopes 1,000 people a night will pay between and 10 pounds and 65 pounds (around P600 to P4,000) to watch a live stream of the pair who have not acted together since they set the small screen alight as the young Queen Elizabeth II and her husband the Duke of Edinburgh in the Netflix series “The Crown”.

FEATURED STORIES

Meanwhile, a few hundred meters down the road, Britain’s National Theatre is streaming “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” with “Game of Thrones” star Gwendoline Christie on YouTube for free.

In normal times it would be a sell-out with a lucrative transfer to the commercial West End all but guaranteed.

But instead, the theatre is relying on donations from viewers.

Millions watching shows

Streaming may be a boon for opera, ballet and drama lovers desperate for their fix.

But with 75% of British theatres saying they may not survive the year, many are questioning how good streaming can be for theatre’s parlous financial health.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the National Theatre’s online shows during the lockdown have been a roaring success with the public — more than 2.5 million people watched “One Man, Two Guvnors” starring James Corden in one week, and nearly a million more viewed “Jane Eyre” the following week — the viability looks a lot shakier.

Yet for venues that have been shuttered for three months or more, the attraction is obvious.

“Millions of people are watching us,” said Valery Gergiev, the legendary Russian conductor and head of Saint Petersburg’s Mariinsky Theatre.

“Instead of 2,000 people at a concert, we have hundreds of thousands of viewers,” he said.

Ambitious companies like the English National Ballet have been able up their profile online, with director Tamara Rojo convinced that they may be creating a new audience for themselves when theatres reopen.

“I want to believe this has given people who did not have the courage to go into a theatre in the past a window into our world,” she said.

Cutting their own throats?

But the head of the Bolshoi in Moscow warned that while that was all very wonderful, companies may be cutting their own throats.

Although the Bolshoi too has jumped on the streaming bandwagon, Vladimir Urin said few companies appear to have a long-term strategy.

“I am absolutely convinced that those who overuse this medium, broadcasting performances practically after every premiere, are losing audiences,” told the Russian Kommersant daily.

Streaming also lacks the “emotion and magic” between the performer and audience that makes the live experience unique, Urin argued.

But Peter Gelb, his opposite number at the Met in New York — which has invested heavily in streaming — says he has no such fears.

As the pioneer of the retransmission of opera and ballet performances in cinemas — something which has been enthusiastically taken up by other top theatres in the last decade — Gelb is convinced streaming is a powerful marketing weapon.

“I believe that the public will return because while it is very soothing and comforting to have this content available at home, it is ultimately a very satisfying but one-dimensional experience,” he told Agence France-Presse.

And he insisted even free streaming gave “a direct financial benefit for the Met”.

Since the lockdown, he said the Met has 125,000 new supporters in its database as well as 19,000 new donors.

Its VOD service, Met Opera on Demand also doubled the number of its subscribers during the pandemic.

“We had 15,000 subscribers and now we have 33,000 who are paying more than $100 a year to have this content available whenever they want,” Gelb added.

Rojo too believes that streaming may become a useful tool for companies in the post-coronavirus world.

“A piece can have two lives, it can exist in one form on a stage and another live digitally and they complement each other,” she told AFP.

“Now we understand that there is demand and that we can reach people who may never reach us physically.” CL

RELATED STORIES:

Socially-distanced version of ‘The Great Gatsby’ to reopen in London

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Daytime Emmys: ‘The Young and the Restless’ wins best drama

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link.

TAGS: Claire Foy, coronavirus, covid-19, Gwendoline Christie, James Corden, The Crown

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.