Blade Runner 2049 gets good reviews, falls short of box office expectations | Inquirer Entertainment

Blade Runner 2049 gets good reviews, falls short of box office expectations

/ 04:54 PM October 09, 2017

Image: Twitter/@bladerunner

The highly anticipated “Blade Runner 2049” recently premiered in theaters and has been getting mostly positive reviews. However, box office numbers have a different tale to tell.

Based on a $45 million to $55 million opening prediction, “2049” has fallen short, raking in an estimate of only $31.5 million for its opening weekend in the United States and Canada.

ADVERTISEMENT

While its box office performance appears impressive compared to the competition, its $150 million production budget somehow calls for a better outcome, according to Entertainment Weekly.

FEATURED STORIES

On the other hand, the original “Blade Runner” in 1982 was also not as wildly accepted during its time. It was only after several years since its debut that the movie gained a cult following. The movie has since cast its influence on pop culture.

Perhaps “2049” will have that same slow-burning effect that its predecessor had. With a freshness rating of 89 percent on movie review site Rotten Tomatoes, it may be best to see the movie and arrive at a conclusion personally. Alfred Bayle/JB

RELATED STORIES:

LOOK: Newt Scamander of ‘Fantastic Beasts’ denied travel by Ministry of Magic

WATCH: ‘Pacific Rim Uprising’ features new Jaegers, giant monsters

Jackie Chan says script for ‘Rush Hour 4’ now ready

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Blade Runner, Blade Runner 2049, box office, sequel

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.