Johnny Depp loses bid to appeal wife beater libel ruling, turns to US case | Inquirer Entertainment
Close  

Johnny Depp loses bid to appeal wife beater libel ruling, turns to US case

/ 08:08 PM March 25, 2021
johnny depp

Actor Johnny Depp arrives at the High Court in London, Britain July 22, 2020. Image: Reuters/Peter Nicholls

LONDON — London’s Court of Appeal on Thursday refused Johnny Depp permission to challenge a verdict last year that concluded the Hollywood actor was a “wife beater,” meaning his attempt to restore his reputation will shift to United States legal action.

In November, High Court judge Andrew Nicol ruled against Depp, star of films including “Pirates of the Caribbean” and “Edward Scissorhands,” after he brought a libel case against The Sun tabloid newspaper.

ADVERTISEMENT

After three weeks of hearings last summer, Nicol concluded Depp, 57, had violently assaulted his ex-wife, actress Amber Heard, 34, during a tempestuous five-year relationship, putting her in fear of her life.

“As we have said, it is not easy to persuade this court to overturn the findings of a trial judge on purely factual questions,” the two Court of Appeal judges said in their judgment.

FEATURED STORIES

“We do not believe that there is a real prospect of it being prepared to do so in this case.”

Last week, Depp’s lawyers said Nicol’s ruling was “plainly wrong” and asked to rely on new evidence which they said showed Heard’s claim she had donated her divorce settlement to charity was “a calculated and manipulative lie.”

But the Court of Appeal said the hearings before him last summer were fair, his reasons were thorough and there had been no error of law. Depp’s lawyer said he would now focus on a U.S. case he has brought against Heard.

In her evidence to the London High Court, Heard said Depp would turn into a jealous alter ego, “the monster,” after bingeing on drugs and alcohol and had threatened to kill her.

She detailed 14 occasions of extreme violence when she said the actor choked, punched, slapped, head-butted, throttled and kicked her, with Nicol accepting 12 of these accounts as true.

“We are pleased, but by no means surprised, by the court’s denial of Mr. Depp’s application for appeal,” a spokeswoman for Heard said, saying her evidence was “overwhelming and undeniable.”

The Sun said the decision vindicated the evidence Heard gave, saying it had been confident that permission to appeal would be refused.

ADVERTISEMENT

The libel case has already damaged Depp’s career, as he was asked to leave the “Fantastic Beasts” franchise, the movie spin-offs from the “Harry Potter” books and films, days after Nicol’s verdict.

However, he has also filed a $50 million defamation lawsuit against Heard in a Virginia court over an opinion piece she wrote in The Washington Post, and that case is ongoing.

“The evidence presented at last week’s hearing further demonstrates that there are clear and objective reasons to seriously question the decision reached in the [United Kingdom] court,” Depp’s British lawyer Joelle Rich said in a statement.

“Mr. Depp looks forward to presenting the complete, irrefutable evidence of the truth in the U.S. libel case against Ms. Heard where she will have to provide full disclosure.” JB

RELATED STORIES:

Johnny Depp to hear if he can appeal UK ‘wife beater’ ruling

Johnny Depp seeks appeal in UK wife beater libel case

The hottest entertainment news straight to your inbox

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Amber Heard, domestic violence, Johnny Depp, lawsuit, Libel
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our entertainment news

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2021 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.