Why MMFF 2014 is fielding a predictable slate of sequels | Inquirer Entertainment
Viewfinder

Why MMFF 2014 is fielding a predictable slate of sequels

/ 12:02 AM July 13, 2014

RYZZA Mae Dizon returns with “Bossing” sequel.

The Manila Film Festival was originally conceptualized as a showcase for the best movies that the Philippines’ film industry produced. Twelve days were set aside, during which only Filipino movies were shown in Manila theaters, to counteract the dominance of American movies on local screens.

In fact, American films were so dominant that they reigned supreme in all of the movie houses in the city, with only two venues showing Filipino productions! This was due to our “colonial mentality,” which made viewers look down on Filipino films as bakya fare.

Article continues after this advertisement

No cheap quickies

FEATURED STORIES

However, when the first Manila Film Festival unreeled (in 1966) under the auspices of Manila Mayor Antonio Villegas and local producers like Joseph Estrada and Fernando Poe Jr., the viewing public realized that our movies weren’t the cheap quickies for the culturally unwashed that they thought they were.

In fact, some of them were good, professional productions, a number of them even in color—and viewers found themselves enjoying them!

Article continues after this advertisement

In only a few years, the Manila Film Festival became such a successful showcase for the best local productions, that it helped turn the tide of foreign dominance of our movie screens.

Article continues after this advertisement

Uh-oh, trouble

Article continues after this advertisement

Slowly but surely, even outside of the festival’s 12 “exclusive” days (in June), local movies started playing in “American” movie houses—and doing well at the box office—so, the festival achieved exactly what it had set out to do.

Trouble was, the festival became so popular that it was soon expanded into a larger showcase for Filipino movies, and became the Metro Manila Film Festival (MMFF) in 1977.

Article continues after this advertisement

Alas, its success led to excess. The hearty profits it was making for local producers made them dream of even bigger grosses, so the “quality” criterion for choosing official entries to the festival was “relaxed” to a more “commercial” orientation.

The festival was moved to the Christmas season, so there was a preference for “family” movies, and “serious” productions were frowned upon.

VIC SOTTO has top-billed fest top-grosser for the past several years.

As a result, the festival ended up no longer fulfilling its original mandate (providing a showcase for the best Filipino movies) and became what it is now, a “showcase” for big, “commercial” productions that make the most money at the tills.

Predictable slate

This explains why the 2014 MMFF is fielding a predictable slate of sequels—“Praybeyt Benjamin 2,” “Feng Shui 2,” “Kubot: The Aswang Chronicles 2,” “My Big Bossing’s Adventures”—and the umpteenth edition of “Shake, Rattle and Roll.”

In addition, nonsequel but similarly commercial productions like “Magnum Muslim .357” and “English Only, Please” have made the grade. The only “serious” production in the bunch is the historical film, “Bonifacio: Gusto Mo Ba Siyang Makilala?”

Very disappointing

Worse, the very topical drama, “Whistleblower,” failed to get the festival’s official nod, reportedly because it was “too serious” and thus would not do well at the tills.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

This is so disappointing—and instructive: The whole country is agog over the whistle-blowers’ exposés, and yet a film about them is turned down by an official festival? Surely, the MMFF should make room for a couple of relevant movies, and make big money from its six other official entries!

TAGS: Entertainment, Metro Manila Film Festival 2014, MMFF 2014, Movies, Nestor U. Torre, Viewfinder

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.