Drake sues UMG over Kendrick Lamar's 'Not Like Us'

Drake sues UMG for defamation over Kendrick Lamar’s ‘Not Like Us’

/ 09:05 PM January 16, 2025

Drake sues UMG for defamation over Kendrick Lamar's 'Not Like Us'

FILE PHOTO: Rappers Kendrick Lamar (L) and Drake are pictured in Inglewood, California, U.S., on August 27, 2017 and in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, September 9, 2017 respectively in this combination photo. REUTERS/Danny Moloshok (L) and REUTERS/Mark Blinch/File Photo/File Photo

NEW YORK — Drake sued his longtime label on Wednesday, accusing Universal Music Group of defamation for promoting Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” saying the song’s false accusation that the Canadian rapper is a pedophile has put him and his family in danger.

In a complaint in Manhattan federal court, Drake said the song was “intended to convey the specific, unmistakable, and false factual allegation that Drake is a criminal pedophile” and the public should exert “vigilante justice” in response.

Article continues after this advertisement

Drake said it led to attempted break-ins at his home, prompting him to travel with extra security, and pull his seven-year-old son from his Toronto elementary school and the Toronto area.

FEATURED STORIES

He and Lamar, an American rapper who won the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for Music, have feuded for about a decade.

The lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages for defamation and harassment.

“UMG may spin this complaint as a rap beef gone legal, but this lawsuit is not about a war of words between artists,” according to the complaint from Drake, whose given name is Aubrey Drake Graham.

“Notwithstanding a relationship spanning more than a decade, UMG intentionally sought to turn Drake into a pariah, a target for harassment, or worse,” the complaint added. “UMG chose corporate greed over the safety and well-being of its artists.”

Article continues after this advertisement

In a statement, UMG said it has not defamed anyone, called Drake’s claims untrue, and said it would be illogical to harm his reputation after investing massively to make him commercially and financially successful.

UMG also accused Drake of trying to “weaponize” the legal process in seeking damages, and trying to silence Lamar’s creative expression for “having done nothing more than write a song.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Lamar is not a defendant, though Drake called “Not Like Us” defamatory. Drake’s lawyers had no additional comment.

Competing ‘diss’ tracks

Wednesday’s lawsuit followed a November petition in a New York state court in which Drake, through his company Frozen Moments, accused UMG and Spotify of using payola and streaming bots to promote “Not Like Us” at his music’s expense.

Drake withdrew that petition on Tuesday night. His related case against UMG and radio company iHeartMedia remains pending in a Texas state court, online records show.

The feud between Drake and Lamar has played out in part through so-called “diss” tracks including “Not Like Us.”

In that song, released last May 4, Lamar mentioned Drake by name, saying “Drake, I hear you like ’em young” and calling him and others “certified pedophiles.”

A day earlier, Drake released “Family Matters,” appearing to accuse Lamar of physical abuse and infidelity, and questioning whether Lamar’s business partner fathered one of his children.

“Not Like Us” topped Billboard’s Hot 100 for two weeks last year. It received five nominations for the Feb. 2 Grammy Awards, including record of the year and song of the year.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The case is Graham v UMG Recordings Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 25-00399.

TAGS: Drake, Kendrick Lamar, Universal Music Group

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2025 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.