Gag order issued vs Vic Sotto
PALOMA MOVIE

Gag order issued vs Vic Sotto

By: - Reporter
/ 05:10 AM January 14, 2025

IN THE SPOTLIGHT: Vic Sotto, Darryl Yap go head-to-head amid looming ‘Pepsi Paloma’ movie. Image: FILE PHOTOS

(From left) Vic Sotto and Darryl Yap. Image: File photos

MANILA, Philippines — A Muntinlupa court on Monday issued a gag order against actor and television host Marvic “Vic” Sotto and his representatives, prohibiting them from publicly disclosing or discussing details of a case filed over the teaser for the upcoming film, “The Rapists of Pepsi Paloma.”

In a three-page omnibus order, presiding Judge Liezel Aquiatan of the Muntinlupa Regional Trial Court Branch 205 granted the urgent motion for a gag order filed last week by the director, Darryl Yap.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Vic Sotto seeks P35M from film director for defamation

FEATURED STORIES

“All parties are directed to observe strict confidentiality in compliance with the sub judice rule, ensuring that the case proceedings and any related matters remain undisclosed to the public until resolved,” the order read in part.

The court also canceled Wednesday’s hearing and rescheduled it to Friday.

Article continues after this advertisement

Sotto has sued Yap for P35 million on 19 counts of cyberlibel over the 26-second teaser for the film, which tagged him as one of the rapists of 1980s starlet Pepsi Paloma.

In his complaint, Sotto accused Yap of making “defamatory imputations” against him.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Follow @janebautistaINQ on Twitter
TAGS: Vic Sotto

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2025 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.