Rihanna on Snapchat making fun of domestic violence in ad, 'Shame on you'; stocks of the app dropped after | Inquirer Entertainment

Rihanna on Snapchat making fun of domestic violence in ad, ‘Shame on you’; stocks of the app dropped after

/ 05:32 PM March 19, 2018

Image: Instagram/@badgalriri

Rihanna took a stand against social media app Snapchat for running an ad that made fun of domestic violence. The result — stocks of the app dropped by as much as nearly 5 percent last week.

The ad for Android and iOS game “Would You Rather?” appeared on Snapchat around March 11, surprising the social media app’s users. It asked whether they would rather slap Rihanna or punch Chris Brown.


Rihanna suffered domestic violence at the hands of Chris Brown while they were still in a relationship. In 2009, Brown pleaded guilty to the assault case filed against him by the singer. In a documentary released in 2016, Brown admitted to feeling “like a f*cking monster” when he attacked Rihanna in 2009.

It comes as no surprise, therefore, for Rihanna to call out Snapchat for its ad. Through a post in her Instagram Stories, she said, “I’d love to call it ignorance, but I know you ain’t dumb! You spent money to animate something that would intentionally bring shame to DV victims and made a joke of it!!!”


“This isn’t about my personal feelings cause I don’t have much of them… but all the women, children and men that have been victims of DV in the past and especially the ones who haven’t made it out yet,” Rihanna lamented. “[Y]ou let us down.”

Image: Twitter/@GNCordova

Meanwhile, Snapchat’s ad review policy stated that “[all] ads are subject to our review and approval. We reserve the right to reject or remove any ad in our sole discretion for any reason. We also reserve the right to request modifications to any ad, and to require factual substantiation for any claim made in an ad.”

Netizens began sharing screengrabs of Rihanna’s post and that of the ad, with most of their reactions echoing Rihanna’s sentiments about the insensitivity of the ad.

Image: Twitter/@GNCordova

One post called the ad “extremely tone deaf.”

Image: Twitter/@TheRoyceMann

Even Chelsea Clinton spoke up. She criticized the ad for being “[j]ust awful. Awful that anyone thinks this is funny… Awful that any company would approve this…”

Image: Twitter/@ChelseaClinton

Snapchat issued its statement via BBC’s Newsbeat, saying that “[t]he advert was reviewed and approved in error, as it violates our advertising guidelines. We immediately removed the ad last weekend, once we became aware. We are sorry that this happened.”

Still, the effect of of Rihanna’s reaction to the ad was strong, as it had financial repercussions — Snap Inc.’s stocks went down. Snapchat’s stocks had already taken a dip when netizens first learned of the ad, but it went down further immediately after Rihanna posted her statement on Instagram.


Image: Google Finance

Snap shares slid 4.5 percent to $17.05 at 1:46 p.m. in New York, as reported by Bloomberg Technology last Friday, March 16.

The last time Snap Inc. stocks took a major hit was when reality television personality Kylie Jenner tweeted that she no longer used the app. Alfred Bayle/JB


Snapchat parent’s stock plummets after Kylie Jenner tweet

Gal Gadot tribute to Stephen Hawking considered ‘ableist’

Guillermo del Toro launches filmmaking scholarship for Mexicans

The hottest entertainment news straight to your inbox

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Ads, Chris Brown, domestic violence, Rihanna, Snapchat
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our entertainment news

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.