In this image released by National Geographic, Geoffrey Rush portrays Albert Einstein in the National Geographic miniseries, “Genius,” premiering April 25, 2017. (Dusan Martincek/National Geographic via AP)
LOS ANGELES— The unparalleled brilliance and puckish wit? Check. The trademark wild mop of hair? Check. The marital infidelity and free-wheeling sex?
Yes, check again for Albert Einstein, who in National Geographic’s miniseries “Genius” comes across as a full-blooded, hot-blooded figure who lived by his own rules, both scientific and domestic.
The 10-part series, starring Oscar-winning Geoffrey Rush (“Shine”) as the mature physicist and Johnny Flynn (“Lovesick”) as the budding one, also places Einstein firmly in a 20th-century world engulfed by political chaos and war.
“Genius” (debuting 9 p.m. EDT Tuesday) is both entertaining and intelligent, as befits a drama that’s based on Walter Isaacson’s acclaimed 2007 biography, “Einstein: His Life and Universe,” and is the Nat Geo channel’s first scripted series.
READ: Get in touch with Albert Einstein in NatGeo’s “Genius” chatbot
Also credit Ron Howard, who brought another complex scientist to the screen in “A Beautiful Mind,” the 2001 Academy Award-winning film about troubled mathematician John Nash.
There are some “Mind”-type cinematic flourishes in “Genius,” restrained special effects that provide a visual sense of Einstein’s thinking and the universe as he sees it and helpful for the science-challenged.
But the series opens with Rush’s Einstein and a young woman in the throes of passion (intercut, unnervingly, with an assassination that foretells of the upheaval ahead for him and the world).
It was a deliberate choice, said Howard, who directed episode one and is among the series’ executive producers that include Brian Grazer, his longtime creative partner, and Gigi Pritzker. Noah Pink and Ken Biller are the screenwriters.
“Not only did it (the scene) appeal to us dramatically, but it also fulfilled the desire to announce to audiences right away that we weren’t approaching it in an entirely straightforward, traditional and academic way,” Howard said. “We were looking for the drama in the story and willing to deal with Einstein, warts and all.”
“Genius” hopscotches through time as it follows Einstein flailing as an unconventional student; a young lover and imperfect husband and parent; a Jew clashing with the German scientific establishment; and as the conflicted father of the atomic age.
Rush said he was more familiar with aspects of Einstein’s world-changing theory of relativity than with the man himself, a distant figure often reduced to a beaming, wild-haired figure with brains.
“We all know the look of Einstein — it should be an emoji,” Rush said by phone from Australia. As he delved further into Einstein’s life, Rush was struck by his many sides and the fame he achieved for work unknowable by many.
“He experienced a level of global celebrity equal to that of his contemporary, Charlie Chaplin,” Rush said. But while Chaplin’s Little Tramp film character had an everyman appeal, Einstein “managed that by coming up with theories that 99.9 percent of the world had no idea what he was talking about.”
Not all were fans. Einstein was seen as a threat by, among others, fellow German scientists who derided his work as a sign of foreign influence and “devoid” of reality in the changing political order destined to be ruled by Adolf Hitler.
There are parallels with today’s clashes over climate change and other science, Howard said.
“This sort of tactic of trying to galvanize support around a particular agenda by narrowing your focus, as opposed to broadening it, by doubting innovation and trying to rigidly hang on to accepted ideas. There’s nothing new in that,” he said.
Howard wants viewers to appreciate the courage it took the trailblazing Einstein to pursue his ideas against fierce opposition and, despite his own sometimes “less than noble” personal behavior, become a voice for shared humanity.
“There’s a kind of courage required for Einstein to have given us everything he gave us, in addition to the transformative work in physics. The role that he ultimately took on as a philosopher and political force,” Howard said, “that was not something he welcomed at all. It was thrust upon him.”