Portrait of fated lovers as irresponsible amnesiacs | Inquirer Entertainment

Portrait of fated lovers as irresponsible amnesiacs

12:20 AM April 23, 2017

Kathryn Bernardo (left) and Daniel Padilla in “Can’t Help Falling in Love”

Kathryn Bernardo (left) and Daniel Padilla in “Can’t Help Falling in Love”

On the plus side, the latest Daniel Padilla-Kathryn Bernardo rom-com, “Can’t Help Falling in Love” by Mae Cruz-Alviar, helps the popular couple sustain its “maturing” process, casting them in roles that require them to go beyond “kilig value,” and opt for more complex character, plot and theme development.

Given the screen love team’s popularity and influence, the extra effort as the stars slide into their 20s is a good and even necessary gambit, so kudos for the step-up move.

Article continues after this advertisement

On the other hand, the laudable effort has been compromised by scripting quirks and quibbles that occasionally raise viewers’ eyebrows—and keep them in arch, questioning suspension!

FEATURED STORIES

Some problems: Daniel and Kathryn don’t know each other, but at an “event” involving a mayor (Zanjoe Marudo), they both dance and booze up a storm—and end up—instantly married to each other (courtesy of the similarly inebriated and wacko mayor)!

That sounds like a potentially promising albeit wildly crazy plot premise—but, the way it’s developed raises more questions than much-needed answers:

Article continues after this advertisement

First, after recovering from their humongous hangovers, it appears that both Kathryn and Daniel promptly forget about the instant “wedlock”—until the marriage certificate arrives later, just as Kathryn is about to get engaged to her BF of six years (Matteo Guidicelli).

Article continues after this advertisement

Naturally, that throws a huge wrench into Kathryn’s new marital plans, which is why she moves heaven and earth to locate Daniel and get their instant wedlock—unlocked!

Article continues after this advertisement

Later, of course, they realize that they’re actually meant for each other, so they end up letting Fated Love take its course, as it does so often in local “fantasy love” flicks.

But, is that all there is to it? Do viewers just sappily ride along with the “crazy” and “fantasy” proceedings? Sadly, all those unanswered questions get in the way of the empathetic storytelling, and viewers wake up all too soon—with a thud.

Article continues after this advertisement

First, the fact that the leads get roaring drunk, instantly married and promptly forget all about it says a whole lot about them as people.

The film takes time to characterize Daniel and Kathryn as loving and lovable individuals who are doted on by their respective families. But, if they’re such blithe and irresponsible drunkards and “donker-donker” instant amnesiacs—what’s there to love?!

To be able to come up with a wild and crazy plot concept, the production compromises its protagonists too much to still “deserve” viewers’ attention and empathy.

They’re made to behave so crazily and irresponsibly that all self-protective people should avoid them like the plague!

Other negative consequences born out of excessive eccentricity abound, pulling the film further downwards. That’s a pity, because the leads do have occasional “moments” in which they stretch their thespic horizons to some extent.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

But, their characters’ basic “craziness” is too huge a flaw to mitigate against. So, the otherwise creditable “young-adulting” gambit has to be deemed a failure due to faulty scripting.

TAGS: Daniel Padilla, Kathryn Bernardo

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.