When parents do the choosing | Inquirer Entertainment
Viewfinder

When parents do the choosing

/ 12:36 AM April 20, 2017

The rule for TV producers these days is, “Make sure your new show is unusual, so it will stand out from the hundreds of other programs out there!” By that yardstick, “Married by Mom and Dad” more than passes muster.

The TLC show updates and spices up the traditional practice in some countries of parents choosing their children’s intended spouses.

More than that, it stands the practices on its head and gives it a big twist the other way, because the show has the kids asking their folks to do the choosing for them! The times really have changed, huh?

Article continues after this advertisement

The telecast we recently viewed fielded several young ladies and a gent who were looking to get married this year, and didn’t trust their own judgment and selection standards, due to some “disastrous” choices in the past.

FEATURED STORIES

So, they more realistically took the unusual step of asking their folks to do the selecting this time around.

They felt that better choices would be made, because their parents knew them and their needs and expectations really well, but would be able to step back and make more objective choices. Would this, in fact, be the case?

Article continues after this advertisement

The telecast didn’t show the outcome of the search, but we got the feeling that it could turn out to be an iffy process—all the way!

Article continues after this advertisement

The potentially dodgy process included some false or overly idealized expectations with both kids and parents looking for “perfection”— an unrealizable mix of good looks, values, monogamy, earning capacity, social skills and romance. Hey, what alternative universe are you all inhabiting?

Article continues after this advertisement

As a result of all of the unrealistic virtues that were being giddily tossed around, many of the candidates who joined the search via social media quickly fell short of the mark.

Viable life partners
If the searchers don’t stop dreaming, they’ll never come up with the right choices—
namely, prospective spouse materials who will continue to be viable life partners after the temporary “thrill” is gone.

Article continues after this advertisement

It was instructive to see that some of the parents involved were themselves divorced—meaning, their selection standards didn’t work for them. So, how sure could their kids be certain that they would make better choices for them?

The telecast we watched focused on a male searcher, Devin, who had two standout prospects in his sights for his folks to evaluate: Ursula was a self-confident career woman whose character and work ethic were quite impressive—until his folks discovered that she had broken their rule of “absolutely no contact” with their beloved son, since they were doing the choosing.

The other leading candidate, Kelsi, was younger and less established in her line of work, but had broken no rule, so she was more to their liking at this stage of the vetting process. Let’s see who “gets” Devin at the search’s finale.

What about Devin himself? Yes, he’s ceded the big decision to his folks, but even if they make the right choice, scenes featuring him intimate that he’s a rather pampered only child who may still not have gotten his adult act together.

What will he do after the honeymoon with Ursula or Kelsi—or perhaps a third or 10th other bride?

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Letting the parents do the choosing could just postpone the resolution of the problem—not the way to go!

TAGS: TLC, TV

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.