Perverse appeal of intentionally bad flicks | Inquirer Entertainment

Perverse appeal of intentionally bad flicks

/ 12:08 AM October 03, 2015

“SHARKNADO.” Its sequel fully aims to be even more execrable than the original.

“SHARKNADO.” Its sequel fully aims to be even more execrable than the original.

MANY MOVIES are produced with the best of intentions—but end up as really lousy flicks, some of which even end up on annual lists of the worst films of the year!

But, what about movies that are intentionally produced to stink up a storm at the box office—and end up as “horrible hits?”

Article continues after this advertisement

These thoughts come pungently to mind, because the Hollywood film scene is currently agog over the  screening of a new “Sharknado” flick—which fully aims to be even more intentionally execrable than its (sleeper hit) original!

FEATURED STORIES

In the first film, sharks of all kinds, sizes, dispositions and dental splendor literally rained down on everybody’s parade—and the movie’s makers laughed dementedly all the way to the box office (“crazy”—like a fox)!

This time around, anything and everything and everyone—including the US president!—is fair game for all those toothy terrorists from the briny deep—and a (terribly) fun time is again had by all!

Article continues after this advertisement

Is the “Sharknado” phenomenon a savvy exception to the more reasonable rule governing US films? Uh, not so fast—remember “Snakes On A Plane” some seasons ago? That was pretty shlocky too, right?

Article continues after this advertisement

In fact, some Hollywood denizens really aren’t all that averse to making porky pigs’ asses of themselves—as long as there’s money to be made!

Article continues after this advertisement

Film buffs

Less intentionally now, these are some of the lousiest flicks of 2014, as unmirthfully judged by pimply and nerdy bad film buffs—(did you have to suffer through any of them?):

Article continues after this advertisement

“Septic Man” (a septic worker mutates into a horrendous avenger). “The Legend of Hercules” (“a joyless slog featuring far too many muscle men with shaved armpits”). “A Million Ways To Die In The West” (“a comedy that pokes fun at cowboys with lethal humorlessness”). “Miss Meadows” (Katie Holmes plays a teacher who packs a pistol and blows scumbags away—no way to make a successful screen comeback). “Hector And The Search For Happiness” (Simon Pegg “on a nauseating tour of his character’s oblivious narcissism.”)

Now, what about the worst movies of all time? We all have our despised and derided candidates, but the “experts” agree that these are some of the worst—and thus most contrarily deserving: “Waterworld,” “Mortal Kombat,” “Ishtar,” “Barbarella,” “Heaven’s Gate,” “Lost in Space,” “Stop or My Mom Will Shoot,” “Thunderbirds,” “Swept Away,” “Revolver,” “Showgirls,” “Town and Country,” “Soul Plane,” “Coyote Ugly,” “Howard The Duck.” —What’s your contribution to this listless list of losers?

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.