California court won't review Jackson doctor case | Inquirer Entertainment

California court won’t review Jackson doctor case

/ 12:07 AM April 25, 2014

In this Friday, Oct. 21, 2011 file photo, Michael Jackson’s former doctor Conrad Murray sits in a courtroom during his involuntary manslaughter trial in Los Angeles.The California Supreme Court refused Wednesday April 23, 2014, to review the involuntary manslaughter conviction of Michael Jackson’s doctor, rejecting his lawyer’s petition without comment. AP

LOS ANGELES — The California Supreme Court refused Wednesday to review the involuntary manslaughter conviction of Michael Jackson’s doctor, rejecting his lawyer’s petition without comment.

The decision by the state’s highest court was the latest stop on Dr. Conrad Murray’s legal odyssey. A state appeals court upheld his conviction earlier this year and then refused to reconsider its decision.

Article continues after this advertisement

Attorney Valerie Waas said Murray will take his fight to federal court.

FEATURED STORIES

“We’re greatly disappointed but we intend to pursue this in federal court,” Waas said.

She said she telephoned Murray with the news and, “He said, ‘The fight is not over.'”

Article continues after this advertisement

Authorities said Murray gave Jackson a lethal dose of the anesthetic propofol in 2009 while the singer prepared for a series of comeback concerts.

Article continues after this advertisement

Murray was convicted in 2011 and served two years in jail. He was released in October due to a change in California law requiring nonviolent offenders to serve their sentences in county jails and as a result of credits for good behavior.

Article continues after this advertisement

The six-week trial focused on Murray’s care of Jackson, including nightly doses of propofol to help the entertainer sleep.

The earlier appellate court decision said, “The evidence demonstrated that Mr. Jackson was a vulnerable victim and that (Murray) was in a position of trust, and that (Murray) violated the trust relationship by breaching standards of professional conduct in numerous respects.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Since his release, Murray has been traveling and spending time with family, “trying to get his life back together.” Waas said.

She said the federal appeal she plans to file will focus on media coverage of the trial and exposure of the unsequestered jury to the Internet. Murray has maintained throughout his appeals that the jury should have been sequestered due to the flood of publicity surrounding the case.

Originally posted at 9:48 am | Thursday, April 24, 2014

RELATED STORIES

Michael Jackson doctor’s conviction upheld 

Jackson’s doctor released from jail after 2 years

Michael Jackson’s ex-doctor files appeal

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

 

TAGS: California, case, Court, doctor, Michael Jackson, US

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.