Quantcast
Latest Stories

Viewfinder

Angeline Quinto should make it on her own, not as Sarah Geronimo’s clone

By

ANGELINE Quinto

As promised after our review of the film “Born to Love U,” here’s a closer look at Angeline Quinto’s first lead portrayal in Jerome Pobocan’s film:

All told, despite Angeline’s best and most earnest efforts, her performance and characterization fell short of the standards for a promising and effective portrayal by a new screen thespian.

To begin with, while her eyes are expressive enough, they have a characteristically and constantly sad and worried look to them that limits her effectivity in less kawawa scenes.

Her beauty also isn’t what you’d call exceptional, so you wonder why such a to-do is being made over her as a big-screen performer.

Then, as her lead performance gathers steam, you realize more clearly what’s going on. Angeline is being molded pretty much along the lines of the way that another singer-actor, Sarah Geronimo, and her own acting career, has successfully been charted—as a comedy-dramatic-musical performer, with a heavy emphasis on the “kooky comedy” part of the equation, to endear her to the giggly peanut gallery.

For that reason, Angeline’s character here, like Sarah’s in many of her hit starrers, is palaban, wacky and a veritable dervish of knee-jerk delights.

Trouble is, Sarah is better-looking than Angeline, so the new talent is pushed extra-hard to compensate for that, and the eager-beaver stress and strain show.

To be sure, being a new talent, Angeline has fewer bad habits to contend with, but that innate advantage is eroded away by the director’s use of cliché “entertaining” devices to raise the movie’s kilig value, and Angeline’s performance is further weighed down and rendered predictable by this.

The movie’s central problem for Angeline is the fact that she’s made to come up with a full lead portrayal before she’s become aware of the rigorous demands, expectations and necessary context for stellar performances.

Being relatively raw, she does as she’s told, but her portrayal lacks enough of her emotional and artistic inputs for her to make it her own.

It’s fine to be an obedient actor, but the biz needs much more than that.

It really is quite unfair to Angeline to force her to succeed as a screen performer by making her come off as a younger and fresher Sarah. Even the more established star has been trying hard of late to wean herself away from her restricting, cliché screen persona, so why should Angeline now be trapped in it?

If her launching movie turns out to be popular and leads to a follow-up project, Angeline should resolutely counter her handlers’ “safe” career plans for her, and insist on making it as her own person—and screen persona—not as Sarah’s clone.

It also makes sense that her follow-up movie should take fuller advantage of her musical ability, to beef her stellar cachet and “K.”

Movie musicals are making a good comeback, with the success of “Mamma Mia” and the more recent “Rock of Ages,” so a local film musical would be a smart move for Angeline and her handlers.

Of course, her leading man should also be a standout singer, so one-note tragedians needn’t apply. Perhaps a search for a fresh-faced male singing-acting-dancing find could be undertaken?


Follow Us


Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Angeline Quinto , Sarah Geronimo

  • Herbert Baltazar

    Sarah geronimo clone? She strikes me to be a regine velasquez clone. Anyway, bottom line is that she has no originality.

    One thing that made me decide not to watch the movie: Her forever declaration of being in love with Coco Martin, that she is courting him. This might be modern age, kalandian is tolerated but to tell the whole world about it? Ano sya PBB Teens?

    • hustlergalore

      seriously, did you even consider watching that movie?

      joke lang.

  • hustlergalore

    NUT, she is a regine velasquez singing clone and a sarah geronimo acting clone!

    and did you check her rendition of i am telling you i am not going?

    horrendous! que horror!

    she is a well-made product of ABS-CBN HYPE.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SR74J3CPQJXWFMDUUETS2U2P44 Maryrose Clemente

    Angeline should be a Vice Ganda clone instead; mas magkamukha sila. Tingin ko, parang si Vice Ganda yung nasa lap ni Coco Martin sa lay-out ng film. May Vice ganda na, bakit kalilangan pa ang Angeline Quinto na ito? Grabe, kinokopya lang talaga ng husto si Regine!

  • maypakialamako

    kala ko si vice ung nasa pic above! angeline q is better heard than seen.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003989186605 Chay Estacio

    So after all the big hoopla, it came down to this? But wait! There’s more. Didn’t some influential, well known celebrities hold a private screening saying how natural she was in this movie? No offense to Angeline. She did what she was told to do. Act it out. But it fell short of people’s expectations. I fault the network for unleashing her to do the big screen without proper training. She was the creation of the network. That’s fine but they should have allowed Angeline to do work shop because it did not seem to me that she has what it takes to jump into such a big project as this. Maybe in time, she will master the art of acting. Right now, I can say she is a better singer than being an actress. Maybe Kris and Vice Ganda can give her some pointers.

  • Gerry

    A clone of Regine and not Sarah! And she fails in comparison big time! ABS should think of another scheme better than this…tsk, tsk, tsk.



Copyright © 2013, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94