Annabelle Rama seeks reset of arraignment in libel case


Talent manager Annabelle Rama. INQUIRER file photo

MANILA, Philippines—Talent manager Annabelle Rama has asked a Quezon City court to defer her arraignment pending her appeal on the 13 counts of libel for allegedly maligning former actress Nadia Montenegro on her Twitter account.

Rama is seeking a 90-day postponement of the indictment as she is still questioning her indictment by the Quezon City Prosecutors’ Office.

Rama filed her four-page omnibus motion through lawyer Derrick Delegencia after Judge Eleuterio Bathan of the QC Regional Trial Court Branch 92 reset her arraignment for June 11.

The feisty talent manager also asked the court to reconsider its May 25 order denying her motion to suspend the arraignment.

Rama said she has filed a motion for reconsideration with the city prosecutor questioning its April 12, 2012, partial indictment.

Rama is facing 13 counts of libel for allegedly tweeting malicious messages against Montenegro and for making similar statements on two television talk shows last year.

The libel charges add to a string of cases that Montenegro filed against Rama, including oral defamation, falsification of documents, libel and child abuse in relation to Montenegro’s teenage daughters who were pursuing show-biz careers under Rama’s watch.

In her appeal to Bathan, Rama asked for the reversal of the order, saying it might have been issued on the understanding that she was seeking an indefinite suspension of the proceedings.

“Accused seeks the kind indulgence of this court as she acknowledges that it would be too imposing and near improper and unfair to give the inference that she is taking for an indeterminate suspension of this proceedings. Accused’s present motion seeks only a reasonable period that would allow her to exhaust the appeal processes provided by the law against the April 12, 2012, partial resolution of the Quezon City Prosecutor’s Office.”

She added that should no resolution be issued against her motion for reconsideration of the libel cases or her possible ensuing appeal to the Department of Justice, she is willing to be arraigned “without any reservations or preconditions.”

The talent manager proposed an arraignment date of September 10, which she promised to attend.

Rama also asked the court to “balance its acknowledged power and prerogative to proceed with the consolidated criminal cases as against her right to due process, particularly her prerogative to challenge the fiscal’s resolution.”

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • lagalag

    ito ang dapat ikulong

  • wer518241

    tama ka tol, isama si rama kay corona ikulong at bitayin. sinungaling madada.

  • Noynoy8is8inutil

    Ikulong ang Bisaya nga dako ug baba. Ikulong na si Annabelle walay ayo nga tao na. Isug kay walay mo patol sa iyang pagka-boangboang.

  • diamond_digger

    we already have a mad dog in the Senate masquerading as a lady senator. now, do we need one in congress, too? Tigilan na natin ito. pareho pa namang mga bisaya. it’s now high time that the electorate should demonstrate maturity and display intelligence by voting only for the most qualified and civilized.

  • Cdee1207

    Dapat ikulong at bigyan ng financial penalty ang babaing iyan.   Sobrang mabaho at malansa ang bibig ng babaing yan – siguro she ate something that she wasn’t suppose to eat ( noong dekada ’70 sa kanyang pelikula).   Ano ba ang kinain mo at ganyan ang bibig mo.   Sobra kang bastos and sobrang personal ang iyong sinasabi.  You should change kasi it shows your kawalang breeding.

  • FClive

    lisud man kalabanin itong si anabil rama. 

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos