Quantcast
Latest Stories

Leonardo DiCaprio delivers career-best portrayal

By:

DICAPRIO. Unusual thespic daring.

FIRST things first: I’ve finally watched Clint Eastwood’s “J. Edgar” and can categorically state that the US Film Academy member-voters recently did the title-role player an injustice when they chose not to include him among their Best Actor nominees for his portrayal of FBI head, J. Edgar Hoover.

In fact, Dicaprio’s depiction of Hoover should be hailed as his career best, so uncompromising and savagely perceptive is it of Hoover’s many character flaws—and the Achilles heel that was his lifelong homosexuality.

It is J. Edgar’s relationship with his mother (Judi Dench) that turns out to be the key that opens the door leading viewers to an insightful understanding of his complex personality. With such a dominant—and dominating—mother (whom he adored), his own persona was subsumed to hers, and he became the compliant and subservient moon to her bright, firm-willed and dazzling sun. The love was there, but no good could come from such a “lovingly” blighted relationship.

Inner core

DiCaprio’s performance is, at the very least, nomination-worthy, because it is unrelenting in its attempt to peel away the layers to Hoover’s persona, one “ugly” secret at a time. DiCaprio is a matinee idol whose glowing screen persona is the product of his unique mix of great looks and charisma, but he “sacrifices” all that in his at times painfully honest depiction of Hoover.

—On second thought, “J. Edgar” can be seen as the apotheosis of DiCaprio’s career-long penchant for playing beautiful but “sensitive” and “misunderstood” souls who are “different” from most people. Starting with his juvenile characterization of “Gilbert Grape,” through “Total Eclipse” to “The Aviator,” the actor has evinced a psychic affinity with “disturbed” characters in his choice of roles.

But, “J. Edgar” takes that insightful affinity one step further, deep into heretofore uncharted territory. To “expose” Hoover’s most vulnerable core, DiCaprio deglamorizes and even occasionally “uglifies” his celebrated good looks, so that they don’t distract viewers from the mangy man he’s portraying. That takes courage and uncompromising thespic commitment, so we should thank the actor for that, as well.

Best of all, Dicaprio’s portrayal goes beyond the ugly and controversial, and makes viewers understand and care for Hoover—warts, horns and all!

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Academy Awards , Celebrity , Clint Eastwood , Entertainment , J.Edgar , Leonardo di Caprio , movie

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
  • Anonymous

    I hate that Leo is snubbed of the best actor award everytime, much more now, not even a nomination! What the!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4A4RRGXGZ2QUKFZB6W2LU74RMI jr

     Although Leo’s performance on J. Edgar was his best to date, there were other performances by other actors that were not given a nod more fitting of an Oscar nomination. Michael Fassbender’s in Shame was a worse overlook.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4A4RRGXGZ2QUKFZB6W2LU74RMI jr

    Secondly the performance was hurt by the bad make-up.

  • Paul Denille Pascual

    The academy snubbing leo is not surprising. The oscar buzz surrounding his performance has been very low among the precursor award orgs (except gg, sag, bfca). His portrayal has received mixed reviews from oscaralogists. This news is NOT a shocker

  • http://twitter.com/mandy_vmw Amanda Victoria

    The Academy always snubs Leo. He should have won an Oscar a long time ago. Being that he is one of the best actors of his generation. It’s crap and this year I’m not watching The Oscars because of the ridiculousness. The Academy just showed the public that it consists of simple, stupid people.



Copyright 2011 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94