Saturday, July 22, 2017
Close  
entertainment / Columns

Overlooked Filipino films in the ’30s reevaluated and given their due

entertainment / Columns
  • share this
Viewfinder

Overlooked Filipino films in the ’30s reevaluated and given their due

Rosa del Rosario and Fernando Poe Sr. in “Zamboanga”

Rosa del Rosario and Fernando Poe Sr. in “Zamboanga”

At a recent show biz gathering, we were asked to weigh in on the contentious issue of the “golden ages” of the Filipino film. How many exactly have there been?

Some experts start counting from the ’50s and ’60s, when Filipino movies like “Genghis Khan,” “Badjao,” “Anak Dalita,” “Malvarosa” and “Biyaya ng Lupa” started getting noticed in international film festivals.

The ’60s saw a commercial proliferation of quickies and “sleazies” (“bomba” films), so there was a drastic drop in terms of quality.

ADVERTISEMENT

But, by the ’70s, another golden age galvanized local viewers and international festival audiences with the “engaged” movies of Lino Brocka, Ishmael Bernal and their cinematic company.

Ironically, this spike in terms of excellence was followed in the ’90s by the Filipino movie industry’s sudden slump, which saw the annual feature film output plunging from a high of more than 200 to a low and dismal 50.

The mainstream industry is still in the process of recovering from that slump—but the excitement now is over the phenomenal surge of the “indie” industry, jumpstarted by the Cinemalaya film festival and competition, bolstered by other funding groups and festivals.

Enough quality indies have been produced to result in the latest golden age of Filipino films, which have been duly noted and acclaimed by film fests worldwide.

By that brisk review of local film history highlights, there have been three golden ages of Filipino films.

For our part, however, we feel that a sizeable portion of the cinematic “evidence” has been overlooked, so we’d like to help make up for the omission by shedding belated light on it:

Some film people “logically” start counting annual local film output after World War II, because feature film productions forcibly stopped for some years, and recovered only during the postwar period.

But this “logical” gap has made us overlook the ’30s, which were also a productive and outstanding period for local movies.

ADVERTISEMENT

It saw the rise of prolific filmmakers like Jose Nepomuceno, Manuel Silos, Carlos Vander Tolosa, Manuel Conde, Gregorio Fernandez, Octavio Silos, Ramon Estella, Consuelo Osorio and Carlos Padilla Sr., as well as the early films of Gerardo de Leon, Lamberto Avellana and Eddie Romero.

Even better, the ’30s saw the production of outstanding feature films like “Giliw Ko,” “Tunay na Ina,” “Ligaw na Bulaklak,” “Sa Paanan ng Krus,” “Ang Kambal,” “Zamboanga,” “Nasaan Ka Irog,” “Bituing Marikit” and “Madaling Araw.”

The year 1939 saw an output of 40 local movies—a robust harvest for a still-fledgling industry, and quite a number of them were deemed memorable by the oldtimers we’ve talked to.

This indicates that the films and filmmakers of the ’30s should be reevaluated and given their due—resulting in our conclusion that local movies have had four, instead of just three golden ages in the course of their eventful cinematic history.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Entertainment, Filipino films, Movies
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.




© Copyright 1997-2016 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved