A Globe doesn’t guarantee an Oscar | Inquirer Entertainment

A Globe doesn’t guarantee an Oscar

12:13 AM January 15, 2015

LOS ANGELES—Coming-of-age drama “Boyhood” may have earned top honors at the Golden Globes weekend, but industry watchers say everything is still up for grabs in the all-important Oscars race.

All eyes in Hollywood are now on the Academy Award nominations, to be announced tonight, after a few surprise Globes wins on Sunday injected some drama into the annual awards season.

“My first caution to Globes winners: Don’t get over-confident,” said Variety awards editor Tim Gray, warning that the Globes are a poor predictor of glory at the Oscars, set on Feb. 22.

ADVERTISEMENT

Gray pointed out that balloting for the Oscar nominations closed last week.

FEATURED STORIES

“So the Globes won’t affect nominations. As for Oscar winners, nobody hurt their chances, and a few people boosted their goodwill,” he told AFP.

Going into the Globes race, the frontrunner was dark comedy “Birdman,” which had been nominated in seven categories. It won two, including best comedy/musical actor for Michael Keaton—now seen as being in a tight Oscar battle with the other Globes best actor winner, Britain’s Eddie Redmayne (“The Theory of Everything”).

But the top prizes went to “Boyhood”—best film drama and best director for Richard Linklater.

Amy Adams won best comedy/musical actress for “Big Eyes,” while Julianne Moore won best dramatic actress for “Still Alice.” Both women have multiple Oscar nominations, but neither has ever won.

‘Budapest’ surprise

Possibly the biggest surprise of the Globes was Wes Anderson’s stylish caper “The Grand Budapest Hotel” taking best comedy/musical film, over “Birdman.”   “The ‘Grand Budapest’ triumph throws something of a curveball into the Oscar race,” wrote the Los Angeles Times.

ADVERTISEMENT

A key point as the Oscars race unfolds is the vast difference between who votes for the Globes, and who chooses the Oscar winners.

Whereas the Globes are selected by fewer than 100 members of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA), the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences—which hands out the Oscars—has some 6,000 voting members.

“The HFPA [members] are not the film industry,” said Sasha Stone, founder and editor of the website Awards Daily—something of an understatement about a body long lampooned in Hollywood.

For Variety’s Gray, some Globe-winning actors definitely improved their Oscar chances. “The wins for Patricia Arquette, Julianne Moore and JK Simmons are added to some critics’ prizes, and it’s always nice to have a reputation as a winner,” he said.

“And Michael Keaton’s speech was one of the highlights of the evening,” he added. Keaton teared up while talking about his childhood and his own son.

“Globes always give out two best picture prizes, comedy/musical and drama. But even with doubled odds, the Globes winner went on to win an Oscar only four out of the past 10 years,” Gray said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Bottom line: It’s the work that counts with members of the Academy.” AFP

TAGS: Academy Award, films, Golden Globes Awards, oscar

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.